Imperium’s Portrayal of White Supremacists

Imperium (2016) follows Nate Foster (Daniel Radcliffe) as he infiltrates a white supremacist group in order to prevent an act of domestic terrorism. I was originally intending to do a review of the film, which I thoroughly enjoyed. Radcliffe is amazing as Foster, and Toni Collette is masterful as his supervising officer, Angela Zamparo.

I decided to forgo a review and focus on the film’s portrayal of white supremacists. I tried to go to IMDB to discuss the film itself, its acting, its ending etc. However, most posters are still hung up on the film’s portrayal of white supremacists. In many ways, they come across as people offended or amused by how white supremacists are represented. Or they are simply annoyed that a film on white supremacy was made.

Imperium interested me when I first heard about the film, due to its exploration of white supremacy through the eyes of an undercover agent. I have previously discussed Imperium on this blog, since the backlash the film received was highly indicative of racism. IMDB was filled with one thread after another criticizing Hollywood for creating more “left wing propaganda” that was attacking white men and making them “feel guilty”.

White supremacists exist, and we shouldn’t be banned from showing them on screen because some insecure people might see it as a personal attack. Of course, these same people will argue that anyone who complains about negative portrayals of minorities in films are “politically correct” or “social justice warriors”. To them, it only matters if American society’s dominant group, straight white men, are depicted negatively. Imperium does not depict all white men in the film as bad guys. After all, Radcliffe’s character and his supervising officer are both white people, but the alt-right doesn’t want to see any white people portrayed negatively. Meanwhile, minorities must simply disregard every single negative portrayal of themselves since it is “just a movie”. These negative portrayals don’t make us “feel guilty” but they do bother us since we see them so often.

One of the alt-right’s most popular arguments is that Imperium should focus on more pressing issues, like Islamic extremism. Firstly, most terrorist acts in the US are committed by non-Muslim Americans. Even if Muslims were the most deadly terrorists in the US, is a film only allowed to show a fictionalized version of society’s most pressing issues? Would these same people criticize films about serial killers because most murders aren’t caused by serial killers?

Of course, there were also IMDB users who openly defend groups like the KKK and the Aryan Nation since there is nothing wrong with having white pride. Even groups that are openly racist reject the label of “racist”, which is why phrases like “I’m not racist but…” are so popular nowadays. I won’t spend anytime trying to enlighten such people.

I read American Swastika: Inside the White Power Movement’s Hidden Spaces of Hate for a university assignment and was interested to see if this film would reflect any of the case studies explored in the book.

One key theme of the book is that white supremacists are no longer just uneducated rednecks. It is comforting to think that white supremacists all live in the back woods, but that is not fact. American Swastika explored white supremacists of varying education levels, classes and careers. Off the top of my head, one of them was a manager at a technical support company. Many of the ones studied were middle-class or upper-middle class, just like the white supremacists we see in the film. Many of the white supremacists in American Swastika were typical suburban families in many ways, which only makes them more unsettling. The whole point of the book is that someone in your neighbourhood, or maybe even your neighbour, could be a white supremacist.

There was one post on IMDB where a user criticized the film for showing a white supremacist barbecue where one of the wives was serving cupcakes decorated with swastikas.

The cupcakes might seem over the top but American Swastika describes birthday parties where parents would decorate their children’s cakes with white supremacist symbols. Homes are a “safe space” where people can invite other like-minded individuals and unabashedly embrace their views. However, it is easier to see the cupcakes and dismiss it as the work of liberals instead of realizing that such gatherings happen every year in the US. This poster obviously didn’t do his own research either. He saw the cupcakes, and assumed that they were a ridiculous Hollywood creation. Since he calls out “liberals” for their supposed mistake, we can assume he is a conservative and probably someone who was watching the movie feeling like he was personally being attacked. Therefore, he was eager to pick apart the film’s premise and portrayal of white supremacists.

White supremacists aren’t such a fanatical “lunatic fringe” any longer. They realize the importance of blending in from day to day, whether it is in the suburbs, or in a diverse urban environment. Imperium portrays them accurately and if this accurate portrayal scares you, good. It’s supposed to.

 

Batffleck Movie Will Be An Original Story

close-up-look-at-batfleck-s-suit-in-batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice-how-will-batman-lo-369016

You can also watch my video on this topic.

BatmanvSuperman definitely got its fair share of hate but even some of the most vitriolic reviews praise Ben Affleck’s performance as Batman. I gave BatmanvSuperman a 6.5/10 but Ben Affleck is a big part of its re-watchability and once the film was done I remained excited about the batman solo film.

Anyone following my Twitter or Instagram will know that I was hoping for an adaptation of the Red Hood storyline. However, Ben Affleck confirmed that if he were to write the film (which he is), that he would make the story an original one.

Geoff Johns, DC’s Chief Creative Officer, is co-writing and will likely have a great deal of influence on the script as well.

The desire to go with an original story does bring up two issues for me.

1) Ben Affleck’s Main Justification

Affleck stated that he would want to use an original story due to the element of unpredictability. Like BvS, the Batman film will borrow elements from other comics and combine them into a new story. The audience would not know exactly what to expect. This logic does fall flat for me since the excitement of most book adaptations is the anticipation of seeing certain characters and events play out in a different medium. For example, many Game of Thrones fans eagerly awaited the television adaptation of moments like The Red Wedding and a big part of the excitement was the predictability. The predicability can also give way to suspense.

If story lines or characters are being excluded simply to make the story less predictable, then the changes may not always add value to the character and story.

2) Characters/Story Lines Could Be Prematurely Used

One issue that many fans of the film, myself included, had with Doomsday was that his inclusion felt poorly developed. Obviously Doomsday does not need to recite a soliloquy detailing his murderous intentions, but his origin is more interesting in the comics. Also, some poorly rendered CGI took away from the gravitas of the final fight. Now that Doomsday and Superman have already died in this film’s universe, this removes the option of seeing a full Death of Superman arc on screen. The storyline was used (arguably too early) and now must be retired.

I worry that the same thing could happen if pieces of story lines such as Red Hood or Injustice are cobbled together.

Affleck has proven himself to be a good writer. I know reception of the New 52 has been mixed, but I do hear that some of John’s work with DC is amazing so I am hoping that the solo Batman film still delivers an engaging DC story.

Harry Potter 6 Review

Cadeem Lalor originally posted on July 15, 2009 09:57 Article Rating

Critical Value:7.5/10 Entertainment Value: 9/10

A lot of material had to be cut from this movie to make it a manageable length. Some more minor characters as well as some of Voldemort’s history are not mentioned.

Plot: The film revolves around the increase of Death Eater attacks in the wizard and muggle world. Draco Malfoy(Tom Felton) is given a task by Voldemort(Ralph Fiennes). Snape takes part in an Unbreakable Vow with Dracp’s mother to ensure that he will help Draco accomplish his goal if need be. Harry Potter(Daniel Radcliffe) also decides to return to Hogwarts, after Dumbledore convinces him to. Another major point is the return of Professor Slughorn to Hogwarts, whose role as a teacher of Voldemort when he was younger plays a pivotal part in the story.

David Yates does a great job establishing the story in the first few frames, including a shot of Dumbledore and Harry in the midst of reporters that is able to show their bond in only a minute’s worth of footage. The performances of the actors are well done for the most part, with many of them being able to transition from a comedic scenario to a much more serious one. Especially Daniel Radcliffe, who is able to demonstrate a different side of his character after he drinks Felix Felicius, the potion that grants good luck.

However, I found Emma Watson (Hermione) to be unconvincing in a certain scene that requires her to portray sadness. Bonnie Wright (Ginny) has been receiving some criticism for her part. Many complain that she is not good looking enough, I have to agree with that. Her acting came of as wooden to me in some cases and the lines written for her were not always good. There were few times I thought that the dialogue was poorly done, Draco’s dialogue is sometimes repetive since he says “I was chosen” about three times in the movie. There was one instance where Harry mentions that Voldemort killed his parents, which seemed out of place in the context.

The special effects are greatly improved for the most part, although they do seem cartoonish at times. My favourite were the disapparation effects, I haven’t read the books in a while so I hope I spelled that right. The fight scenes are actually few and far between but the story keeps you enthralled without relying on its action, which to me is a sign of a good movie, whether it is action or not. Unlike Transformers 2. When the fight scenes do arrive they are thrilling, but I found them to be too short. There is one included that was not in the book.

To prevent spoilers I will just say that this fight could have been greatly improved. Hopefully the seventh movie clears up a major question revolving around another plot change. With the way the movie ended an important plot line was greatly changed.

Overall Harry Potter 6 delivered as a great movie but could have been better as an adaptation. For those who liked the other films and have not read the books you will be greatly pleased with this one and it may be your favourite yet. If you have read the books you may be disappointed by the changes or might be willing to accept them and enjoy the film for what it is