When Racists Expose Themselves

I posted the above video to YouTube a while ago, after reading some of the criticism for Keith Stanfield playing L in the Netflix live-action Death Note film. I found it interesting that people used the same hackneyed arguments of “best actor for the part” to defend Light’s whitewashing, while opposing “blackwashing.” For me, the reaction was the perfect microcosm of a wider issue: People defend whitewashing, but then complain about “blackwashing” or any race change where a white person becomes another race.

Of course, my video got some support, but comments were generally negative. Plenty of people demonstrated their short attention spans by using arguments I shut down in my video e.g.

“Light looks white thought.”

Doesn’t matter. Asian anime styles don’t draw their Asian characters the stereotypical way Western audiences might be used to e.g slanted eyes, yellow skin.

Light Yagami, a man with a Japanese last name is a man who lives in Japan. His parents are his biological ones. The show never hinted his parents were white expats or anything like that. If you ignore location, names etc. and say he must be white because you don’t see slanted eyes, you are an idiot. That is all.

The people who criticized my video pointing out examples of blackwashing also missed the point. The same people saying they wouldn’t want to see a white Luke Cage are some of the same people who defended whitewashing in The Last Airbender and Ghost in the Shell.

Which brings me to my point. A user, Crypt Tonio, commented complaining about black Achilles in the BBC Troy series. By falling back on this kind of argument, Tonio just makes it clear he missed my point because he got defensive and rushed to the comment section. If he complains about black Achilles and defends whitewashing, such as Exodus: Gods and Kings then his argument collapses. Both tales have historical elements, intertwined with mythology. Both have a distinct setting that implies a certain race for viewers. I have no doubt Tonio defended Exodus, while complaining about Troy.

What I found more amusing was that he replied to someone else’s comment, finding a way to bring refugees into a conversation about Death Note. Crypt Tonio goes on a rant about black people in the US feeling like they’re owed something and then jumps to refugees. That just shows me that is all he thinks about when he thinks about black people. So of course he is triggered when he sees my video and rushes in to derail the conversation. I hid him from my channel but if you wish, you can look up his username and access his comments yourself.

Triggered a.k.a You Disagree With Me

Anyone who engages in any form of communication online is surely familiar with the term “triggered”. At the most basic level it is used to criticize people who care or get “worked up” about a certain issue. It is normally used by conservatives or the right-wing to shut down any discussion of a topic they don’t care about. If you are one of those people who doesn’t believe in the left/right classification, read the below excerpt from another one of my articles:

People love to say that they don’t like pigeonholing themselves as right or left wing, or that they don’t identify with the spectrum at all. They are a unique snowflake who isn’t like the rest of the sheep they look down on. This argument parallels the infamous “race is a social construct” argument. The fact that something is socially constructed does not mean its impact can be ignored or simply dismissed. Our use of hours and minutes to plan our day is a social construct that has developed over centuries, and the political spectrum is the same. Are you pro-life or pro-choice? Are you against social security or not? Are you a gun-control advocate or not? The answers to these questions will place you somewhere on the spectrum. The totality of your views about different political issues will see you land somewhere; left, right, center-right, center-left etc.

picture-2

 

Think that’s deterministic, rigid, stupid? Ok, then let me throw off another social construct. I no longer recognize myself as a black man. So a girl who only dates white guys will still be interested right? Cops who are more suspicious of black people will no longer feel the need to pull me over or frisk me, right?

Anyway…

Triggered isn’t just a word used to denote passion or concern for an issue. It has a negative connotation. It is applied to the “politically correct snowflakes” who get “offended by everything”.

I have touched on the double standards in what people choose to care about in previous articles, such as my articles on whitewashing v blackwashing and my article on how easy it is for minority inclusion in a film to be viewed as “forced” or “heavy-handed“.

If someone criticizes someone else for being “triggered”, it implies that the accuser doesn’t have any issues that he gets worked up about. The same person who calls someone a social justice warrior (SJW) or pc snowflake because they care about whitewashing is the same person who gets worked up when they see an example of “blackwashing”. The same person who shuts down a conversation about police brutality against black people will be the same person who gets “triggered” when they see a gay couple in a tv show or a black student union on a university campus.

Yes, some people are too sensitive and get worked up or “triggered” over something that is not real discrimination or a real issue. However, right-wing buzzwords like pc and sjw start to lose their meaning when people use the terms to describe everything ranging from protest against Trump’s Muslim ban to calling little people “vertically challenged”. Maybe some people are only using the terms pc to describe the latter example but there are plenty of people who think anything that does not endorse their outright bigotry is politically correct. The problem is not the world around you. The world around you isn’t getting “too liberal”. It is catching up to modernity. Yes, you can no longer say all Muslims are terrorists or that Mexico doesn’t send its best without a lot of people disagreeing with you.

Minorities are now allowed to have groups for themselves, because they are MINORITIES. China doesn’t have Chinese student associations and the US doesn’t have white student unions. I doubt people who hate black student unions would get as worked up if they saw Polish student unions.

Yes, we now live in a world where there are more gay and interracial couples out there. Or maybe there aren’t more. Maybe we just have more who are willing to come out since it is no longer illegal in the US and they are less likely to face physical violence for it. Of course, they can still face rejection from friends and family. Or they can face disgust from people forced to see them represented on screen. I have literally seen someone on IMDB’s forums (RIP), complain about a three second kiss between two gay characters on The Walking Dead. I really wish I could still access the post, because the IMDB poster literally said homosexuality was being “forced down his throat”. Realize that the heavy-handed homosexuality this poster was complaining about was a three second kiss between two male characters. If that is heavy-handed homosexuality, are all the kisses and implied sex in The Walking Dead heavy-handed heterosexuality? Didn’t think so. For people who are bigoted, any inclusion of minorities on screen is too much. It becomes part of an “agenda”, is “forced” or “pc.” A two second gay kiss can be interpreted as an entire episode where the writers were trying to force them to sleep with a man at gunpoint.

We are now in a world that is more divided politically than ever. Not because the left discusses racism or discrimination too much. We listen to the right’s arguments, we pick them apart with facts. They hear our arguments, they don’t listen. They jump to straw man arguments, denial, racist assumptions etc. This is something I’ve experienced personally with comments on my articles, YouTube videos, tweets etc. Or something I have seen from the reactions people have to any liberal thoughts they come across online.

It is a toxic environment where both sides can start to drive each other to further extremes. Maybe the conservative who starts off a little disgruntled with minorities, because he thinks Black C students get all the good schools and jobs now, isn’t able to find the same support he used to find among his friends or co-workers. Then he turns to more conservative sites that fuel his ideas about the world. Like Dylan Roof, the Charleston church shooter, maybe he finds skewed statistics and narratives about Black Lives Matter orchestrating police killings. Then maybe he decides that if the majority of the world (from his point of view) doesn’t see the problem he sees, he’ll try to deal with it himself.