Yesterday, I received the first legitimate comment on one of my blog posts. By legitimate I mean that the post wasn’t spam. I got the notification while I was uploading yesterday’s post and was initially excited to engage with a reader. Unfortunately, this comment apparently came from an idiot: David Sirmons at email@example.com.
His comment was in response to my article on Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman. In the article I criticized the perception that an attractive woman has to be a dainty one. To this day, I still think Gal Gadot could gain at least another ten pounds for her role as Wonder Woman, but this mindset gets criticized by those who think we want Wonder Woman to be too “brutish” and “unwomanly”. I used Jessica Biel as an example of a more muscular woman who lifts weights, while also remaining “womanly” and very attractive. I said Biel was brutish as a sarcastic statement that accompanied this picture. If David read the whole article he probably would have realized that, but he is likely one of the people who only skimmed it before posting a comment and making a fool of himself:
“Jessica Biel? Brutish?!? You have a slim view of what constitutes ‘brutish’ in a woman. Google is your friend for enlightenment. Biel is fantastically in shape, and is far closer to the bodytype needed in WW. Your entire article above speaks out how Gal needs to put on more weight. I fully agree. But if you think Biel is oversized……jesus. You don’t get out that damn much it seems. She’s great, and her body type is right in line with WW. Odd how you prefer the actually stocky and oversized Carano over Biel. Get your dipshit eyes checked.”
So even though David says exactly what I was saying, that Biel’s body is closer to what WW should have, he doesn’t realize that is what I was saying. David is probably one of the dim-witted people who will retort to an argument by writing “TL:DR(too long, didn’t read”. Sadly, this post that David commented on wasn’t even one of the longer ones. It is about 1000 words, but is also broken up with plenty of paragraphs and links. I guess that was still too much for poor David to get through, and he had to resort to posting an idiotic comment. Hopefully this blog post isn’t too long for him.
I was hesitant to call him out originally, since David is not the only person involved in this kind of stupidity online. This is not the first time that an argument has been completely misinterpreted online. There are plenty of longer articles on independent blogs and sites like medium, but many of those posts are broken up with images and short paragraphs. It is a shame but it seems like this is the world we live in now, where we need to accommodate for shorter attention spans instead of trying to fight them. Fifty years from now, maybe articles will all need to be under a certain length for anyone to bother reading them. If the attention cut off point is 1000 words now, maybe it will slim down to 500 words in another twenty years.
I am not saying I am immune to a shortened attention span, I am only saying that I try to be mindful of it and fight against it. I avoid staying on apps like instagram or sites like YouTube for too long. Over the past few months I have made an active commitment to watch tv and play video games less, substituting that time with reading physical books. I meditate, I exercise, I do a host of things in the hope of clearing my mind and staying more focused. Basically, I do all those things to be less like David. Thank you for commenting David, and for showing me what I could turn out to be if I am not careful.
Update: I received an email response from David after I called him out on his mistake. Below is his articulate retort:
“True, I didn’t read it all. I only read the area that I was presented with regarding the image. Still, you called her brutish, did you not? Yes, you did.